October 29. 2019

Hulk Hogan (real name Terry Bollea)

A prime example of the judicial corruption and privacy abuses that are occurring in America, victimizing innocent people, is encapsulated in the 2016 Bollea vs. Gawker lawsuit, which I re-read this month, after covering it on this site 3-years ago. U.S. federal judge, James Whittemore, violated wrestler Hulk Hogan's rights in his lawsuit against Gawker, who published footage on their website of Hogan having consensual sex with Heather Clem in her bedroom.

Unbeknownst to Hogan, he and Clem were secretly being filmed by her lawless husband, shock jock Bubba the Love Sponge (real name Todd Alan Clem), who was hiding in the closet with a video camera. Alan Clem has a disgraceful legal history of animal cruelty, ordering an act of sexual assault, bribery, fraud and defamation, which resulted in lawsuits being filed against him by several litigants.

Bubba the Love Sponge sold the footage of his wife and Hogan to Gawker, who did not obtain the consent of Hogan to publish the secretly filmed sex tape. When Hogan's lawyers filed the case in federal court in Florida (Tampa), Judge James Whittemore refused to issue an injunction, which would legally compel and bar Gawker from further disseminating the secretly filmed sex tape. It would also force them to remove the tape from the internet and not air it anywhere else.

One would think human decency demands the secretly and illegally made tape should be removed from public view and not aired again, after a man's privacy was so grotesquely violated, in conduct that broke voyeurism laws in the State of Florida (Florida Statute 810.14). However, not Judge Whittemore, who perversely and insidiously ruled the illegal tape is of "public interest" and should remain online. It is one of the dirtiest things I've ever seen a judge do. It completely obliterated and destroyed the little faith I had left in the U.S. judicial system.

Judge Whittemore would not like it if someone secretly hid in his closet or that of his wife, child or grandchildren, filmed them in states of undress and or engaging in sex acts with others, then uploaded it onto the internet for anyone to see. He would be enraged, sue and contact the police to file charges.

However, Judge Whittemore had no qualms about violating Hogan's legal rights in perversely stating a nasty, illegal act of voyeurism should remain on the internet via an unlawfully made sex tape, as in his corrupted and depraved opinion/legal ruling, it is a matter of "public interest."

I ask you, members of the public, if someone secretly hid in a closet and filmed you, your spouse or one of your children or grandchild in states of undress or having sex with others, then uploaded it to the internet like dirty, depraved perverts, would you not want to be able to trust that the legal system would work in your favor and or that of your family, to immediately stop the violation of your rights from continuing, after criminals violated your privacy and soul in such a sick manner.

Bubba The Love Sponge Clem and wife Heather Clem

Judge Whittemore's ruling sent America and the world the nasty, chilling message that someone can secretly film you, your spouse, your children or grandchildren in places where, as the U.S. legal criteria mentions in statute after statue across the country "privacy is to be expected" such as a person's bedroom, lover's bedroom or hotel room, then upload the footage and criminally turn you into and or a loved one into a porn star without consent.

I don't understand this kind of corrupt thinking or the ensuing court corruption emanating from it, which is essentially in defense of the indefensible. The law is supposed to be there to protect people, not aid the criminals in violating the public. If at the end of the day, a judge can't do the right and honorable thing, in administering their oath of office, to protect the public and bring justice, the legal system has failed.

Now anyone can cite Whittemore's ruling in trying to get away with such depraved, voyeuristic behavior, even against a defenseless child, who could perversely be secretly filmed in states of undress without their consent, and under said stupid ruling, the footage remain in circulation online. And don't think it can't happen.

Years ago outside a Florida courtroom, a Google lawyer stated something very disturbing to me. I had sued Google over taking several weeks to remove a dangerous, defamatory impersonation blog from Google's Blogspot blogging service, which Madonna instructed one of her hackers to put online, pretending to be me. I found it in a search bearing my name and some of my clean, wholesome articles from the Judiciary Report.

When I clicked the link in the Google search engine, I discovered Madonna's hacker had set up a fraudulent Google Blogspot blog, proclaiming it to be mine (it never was). To make it look like it was mine, he copied verbatim wholesome articles from the Judiciary Report. However, he added sick, unlawful items to the fake, impersonation blog as well, such as pictures of nude underage looking Asian girls and reckless, incendiary threats against the Islamic terrorist group Boko Haram, with the hope of them reading it, issuing a fatwa and killing me over something I didn't even write.

After arguing before the judge over the release of the identity of Madonna's hacker, Google eventually caved in and gave me the IP address of one of her hackers who had not only put the aforementioned, fake impersonation blog online, he had emailed me a death threat with racial slurs to this site (he also tried to make good on the death threat but failed). Then I subpoenaed the IP address host, AT&T, who promptly released Madonna's hacker's identity without argument (Randy Vaughn).

After the hearing, Google's attorney angrily stated to me outside the courtroom that a judge in Florida has left child porn on AOL for years (in an unrelated case), despite the parents of the abused young victim suing in court to have it removed. Therefore, in his estimation, Google leaving Madonna and her hacker's sick impersonation blog with child porn and Boko Haram death threats online for several weeks after I complained to the company in writing, pales in comparison.

Judge James Whittemore

There is some sick stuff going on in Hollywood. These cults such as Kabbalah and Scientology are engaging in some very evil conduct against innocent people. They do not belong on television or the radio. They should be locked away in mental asylums for public safety.

I currently live in Florida where Scientology has built a weird headquarters. If you do court docket searches on Scientology, you will find a slew of horrible human rights abuse lawsuits against the company that even include wrongful death, stemming from torture. In fact, Whittemore has presided over Scientology cases in Florida. Kabbalah has also been sued by a number of people in America for terrible human rights abuses, including assault, sexual assault, threats, invasion of privacy, criminal stalking and harassment, among other things.

Something needs to be done about these Hollywood cults on a congressional level. sexual assault against adults (as seen in cases such as Harvey Weinstein) and pedophilia is running rampant in Hollywood cults. Many cult members have not been indicted yet and are still abusing adults and children.

For example, movie director Bryan Singer is a massive pedophile, who has even filmed underage boys he molested. He is a part of a sick pedophile ring in Hollywood, who are molesting children on a regular basis, filming these sick acts and passing it around amongst themselves. They even have pedophile parties in Hollywood where they molest minors. Victims and terrified former personal assistants to cult members who witnessed some of the depravity have been complaining about it.

There are Hollywood stars and executives who are secretly watching people in their homes round the clock, via private investigators they paid in the commissioned hacking of webcams and mobile phone cameras, and break-ins to private homes of people they target (as seen in the Anthony Pellicano criminal trial, regarding Madonna and Harvey Weinstein's private investigator, who was convicted on a host of criminal charges such as illegal wiretapping, hacking, identity theft and racketeering). Hollywood stars and executives have been paying other private investigators to illegally install surveillance equipment in people's homes during break-ins (such as pinhole hidden cameras) in violation of the Constitution as well as state laws. Hollywood is sick and abominable.

It is a struggle for victims to get justice in legal cases pertaining to these privacy matters in America. Whittemore's ruling in the Hulk Hogan case is a terrible indictment of what the judicial system has become and in clear sight of America and the world. High profile criminals and companies they work for are trampling the human rights of others.

This is one of the things that alarms me about the court system, particularly on the federal level. They constantly rule with rich corporations and trample the rights of the other party in the case. This is why some wealthy lawbreakers and those they are associated with in the corporate sector are so lawless. They know any lawsuit filed against them, unless done by a richer corporation or wealthier person, has a 99% chance of being dismissed, enabling them to walk away scot free and or with the financial profits of crime.

It took Peter Thiel, a billionaire funding Hogan's lawsuit against wealthy Gawker, for it to prevail on the second try, but in a state court, after the federal court outrageously ruled against the wrestler, who is the victim of crime. The average victim of crime in America doesn't have Peter Thiel's billions to fight for their rights in court and end up losing when they are up against rich corporate offenders and wealthy criminals.

While the Hogan case later prevailed in the second lawsuit which he filed in state court (as opposed to federal) with a jury of everyday Americans correctly awarding him $140,000,000 due to the sick thing that was done to him by Bubba the Love Sponge and Gawker, Whittemore's highly questionable federal ruling denying the injunction on the illegal sex tape still stands in the other court (federal) and inappropriately so. It set a terrible and alarming precedent that any other human rights abuser can cite against an adult...or a child who is a victim of voyeurism.