Home
      |  Articles      |  Exclusives       |  About       |  Links       |  Contact

.

Twitter Is Discriminating Against Non-Liberals And The FBI Is Illegally Involved

March 28. 2020

The liberal owned social networking website Twitter has been formally accused of discriminating against conservatives, centrists and libertarians. U.S. President Donald Trump accused Twitter of tampering with his 60,000,000 follow count, as has other conservatives, centrists and libertarians who use the site.

There are also conservatives, centrists and libertarians who have formally accused Twitter of "shadowbanning" them. Twitter denies this, but there are many third party sites and software that confirm Twitter is "shadowbanning" people. I’ve seen it with my own eyes and made snapshots of it.

I’ve used third party analytic software by four different companies to analyze my follow count, as I’ve seen very strange things occur with my Twitter account such as my account inflowing people I did not unfollow, freezing up, glitching, tweets not going through, tweets going through but the username of the person it was sent to removed once published. I’ve also seen tweets retweeted on my page that I never retweeted. I’ve seen the names of trending items tweeted out from my account when I did not do it.

Regarding the irregularities with my follow count, I’ve made notes and snapshots of how many people I’m following before and after I log out, but by the next morning it will show hundreds of less people I’m following, without me having logged back in to unfollow anyone. This happens on a regular basis. I’ve repeatedly changed my password but this madness keeps happening, indicating it is being done on Twitter’s back end.

In total Twitter has removed over 25,000 people from my follow count that should not have been removed. My follow count should be approximately 61,000, instead it is stating 36,000. And no, I’ve never bought followers. And no, all those people were not suspended. A number of them were "shadowbanned" so they're not showing up in search results or follow counts at all.

The different software programs I used calculated how many people I unfollowed (but I didn’t unfollow the people listed) and how many were suspended or shadowbanned and it still did not account for the crazy drop in how many people I am following. The same goes for how many people are following me as well. Simply put, the numbers do not add up. Something strange is going on regarding the backend of Twitter. Numbers are being rigged. I have the proof.

I’m also noticing the shadowbanned accounts do not count anymore towards a person’s follow count. You’re still following the shadowbanned account, but they’ve been removed from everyone’s follow count.

I’ve also observed via different third party analytic software that a number of shadowbanned and restricted accounts are conservatives, centrists and libertarians. Why is that (rhetorical). Some of the accounts I know and they didn’t state anything worthy of being shadow banned. They don’t support the Democrats is the common thread I saw among many of the shadowbanned accounts.

I’ve noticed at times my tweets and that of other conservatives, centrists and libertarians do not come up in the Twitter search results, which is a complaint shared by many conservatives, centrists and libertarians. Meanwhile the tweets of liberals are prominently displayed, even those that barely get a retweet or a favorite.

At times my username of all things doesn’t even show up when you search for my name on Twitter. Others conservatives, centrists and libertarians are having the same problem, regarding Twitter trying to bury accounts because they do not have a liberal point of view like the sites owners and the feds.

I’ve noticed when I write unflattering articles on this site about any Democrat or Hollywood figures, my Twitter account begins to mysteriously malfunction, the following and follower count gets tampered with and all the aforementioned discrimination I’ve listed is ramped up against my account.

I saved snapshots/screen caps and html versions of a Twitter page belonging to someone who had offended certain high profile Hollywood people connected to Twitter and they had his account tampered with. In a matter of hours they stripped away over 700,000 of his followers. I kept making snapshots of the entire thing. After complaints were sent, Twitter put the 700,000 followers back that they‘d questionably removed. It was bizarre but gave the game away.

Recently, billionaire Paul Singer of Elliott Management bought a “sizeable stake” of Twitter’s shares in a bid to remove one of its founders, Jack Dorsey, who is a liberal. While I do not agree with ousting people from the companies they’ve founded, Twitter’s discrimination and bias against conservatives, centrists and libertarians is what is causing these takeover attempts.

At the end of the day you can try to censor people’s written and spoken opinions, but you can’t censor the public’s minds. There are billions of people all over the world who are not liberals. Learn to accept that. Everyone is entitled to their point of view. The world has liberals, conservatives, centrists and libertarians and that's fine. Freedom of expression is a human right and not one to be stripped away by social networking (or anyone else).

To open up a social networking site to the public, then discriminate against people for their lawful opinions that do not contain your political or personal point of view, is dishonest, inappropriate and lacks integrity.

Under U.S. and international law it is also criminal fraud and indictable. I’m going to make a prediction (and many of my predictions have happened) the discrimination being faced by conservatives, centrists and libertarians on Twitter is going to end up in Congress with serious legal implications for select Twitter employees.

I also have it on good authority the FBI has been getting accounts suspended on Twitter for political reasons, which is unlawful, unconstitutional and un-American. The FBI can't decry communism while behaving like America is a communist country. How is the FBI going to condemn China and Russia, while doing the exact same thing.

The FBI is not supposed to be meddling in social networking, but they are and to the public's detriment. Once again, this is why deadly terrorist attacks and domestic acts of terrorism such as the Boston Marathon bombing, the Pulse night club mass murderer, and the Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School mass shooter, among many others, keep happening, even after members of the public warn the FBI.

The corrupt FBI is too busy screwing around on social networking, spying on people they’re not supposed to spy on (via wiretaps, backend social networking snooping, computer hacks, email hacks and stalking) and doing so for political and financial reasons.

Not to mention, stealing intellectual property from American and foreign companies, which is very illegal and unethical (Former FBI Directors Robert Mueller And James Comey Criminally Defrauded Florida Submarine Company Out Of Billions Of Dollars In Copyrights And Patents To Benefit Former Employer Lockheed Martin Then Stonewalled Congress Regarding It and The FBI Is Stonewalling Congress On Releasing FBI File In Madonna Human Rights Abuse Case (Congressional Documents)).

When an agency, the FBI, is that busy breaking the law, there's no time to fight crime.

Side Bar: the friend counts on some mainstream celebrities pages on Twitter and Instagram are wrong. How could the Kardashians have over 100 million followers yet their shows have such poor ratings, averaging 1 million viewers per episode.

STORY SOURCE

Republican mega-donor buys stake in Twitter and seeks to oust Jack Dorsey – report

Billionaire Paul Singer’s Elliott Management has taken a ‘sizable stake’ and intends to ‘push for changes’, reports Bloomberg News

Sat 29 Feb 2020 10.13 EST - Last modified on Sat 29 Feb 2020 15.11 EST - A major Republican donor has purchased a stake in Twitter and is reportedly seeking to oust its chief executive, Jack Dorsey. Bloomberg News first reported that Elliott Management has taken a “sizable stake” and “and plans to push for changes at the social media company, including replacing Dorsey”.

Paul Singer, the billionaire founder of Elliott Management, is a Republican mega-donor who opposed Donald Trump during the real-estate magnate’s run for the presidential nomination but has since come onside. After a White House visit in February 2017, Trump said Singer “was very much involved with the anti-Trump or, as they say, ‘Never Trump’, and Paul just left, and he’s given us his total support and it’s all about unification”. Trump famously communicates with the public largely through Twitter, at the expense of traditional media strategy...

https://www.theguardian.com

Trump Accuses Twitter Of Tampering With His Follower Count Due To Its Political Bias

December 18, 2018 - President Trump on Tuesday launched an attack on social media platforms, accusing them of bias against him, and specifically accused Twitter of making it harder to follow him while cutting down his follower count. He delivered these charges, ironically, on Twitter itself.

“Facebook, Twitter and Google are so biased toward the Dems it is ridiculous!,” the president tweeted Tuesday morning. “Twitter, in fact, has made it much more difficult for people to join @realDonaldTrump. They have removed many names & greatly slowed the level and speed of increase. They have acknowledged-done NOTHING!”...

https://www.inquisitr.com

.

 


© Copyright 2007 - 2019 Aisha. All Rights Reserved. Web site design by Aisha

Aisha | Goodison Trust | | Sonustar News | Judiciary Report | Sound Off Column | Celluloid Film Review | Medicine And Science Times | Consumer News Reviews | Compendius | United Peace Initiative | Justice And Truth