November 11. 2020

Journalist and television host, Martin Bashir, is on the hot seat over his 1995 BBC "Panorama" interview with the late Princess Diana, where she spoke of the traumatic situations in her marriage to adulterous husband, Prince Charles.

Princess Diana spoke of Prince Charles' affair with longtime girlfriend, Camilla Parker-Bowles, which began before their marriage and went on throughout and after it. The interview spread around the world like wildfire and became historic.

However, news has now surfaced from Princess Diana's brother, Earl Spencer, that Bashir and the BBC used forged documents to obtain the interview under false pretenses, by scaring his sister into thinking she was being spied on locally. Spencer states he was just made aware of this information recently.

Spencer states the BBC knew the truth for the past 2-years and covered it up. The BBC has now launched an investigation into Spencer's claims, as the story has become a scandal in Britain this week. Bashir, who currently has coronavirus (Covid-19) has declined to be interviewed on the subject.

Princess Diana, Prince Harry and Prince William in the 1990s

Princess Diana was in fact being illegally spied on by the United States NSA, CIA and FBI. People in intelligence have gone on record in Britain stating Princess Diana was being spied on by former U.S. president Bill Clinton and his intelligence services, as people within the British government and monarchy could not lawfully do so.

It was characterized as one hand washing the other, where Britain would spy on U.S. targets for people in Washington using Echelon, and America would spy on British targets for people within the British government or monarchy.

When pressed on the issue after the royal's death, the NSA stated they do have a file on Princess Diana that is 1,056-pages, but will not release it, as it has been classified ("Because their disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security"). They revealed the release of the voluminous file would harm national security and cause injury to the U.S. government's name in the world.

The NSA abused the U.S. classification system to illegally classify files that illustrate they and others broke the law to illegally spy on Princess Diana (and others). This is standard misconduct from the NSA, FBI and CIA, which Congress needs to address, as it is damaging the government's standing in the world.

Princess Diana

This stood out to me, as it is the same rubbish the FBI sent me in a letter about in reference to my Freedom of Information Act request  [The FBI Is Stonewalling Congress On Releasing FBI File In Madonna Human Rights Abuse Case (Congressional Documents)]. They corruptly claimed its disclosure would cause damage to national security. And here's why (Joe Biden Is A Power Hungry Criminal From The Obama Administration Following A Movie Script).

While I'm not comparing myself to Princess Diana, who is my favorite royal, I'm trying to illustrate to you the public what is illegally transpiring regarding innocent people being unlawfully spied on in very invasive ways, by individuals in government and related entities.

They are using roundabout ways to break the law, in achieving the goal of illegally and surreptitiously spying on innocent people for an undue advantage or financial gain. These things are being done in terrible ways at the expense of other people's privacy.

People who have access to a very large audience, groundbreaking information or valuable assets that high profile figures or government entities seek to unlawfully exploit, are in danger of having their privacy grotesquely violated, among other things.

Princess Diana

In the case of Princess Diana, the U.S. intelligence services recorded her conversations, even on the day she was killed in a horrible car crash. They were in the vicinity of the crash. The U.S. government has foreign offices with agents stationed in many countries, who are easy to dispatch to any target.

Princess Diana was the most famous woman in the world. So many people loved her and still do. She had access to large international audiences, who paid close attention to the things she would say. People within the royal family feared what Princess Diana would say, because she had been exploited, treated very poorly and grew tired of the abuse.

Princess Diana had amassed so much influence, even more than the Queen, which meant her words would instantly go out to a very large audience within moments and could either make or break someone.

When Princess Diana stated "there was three of us in this marriage" regarding Prince Charles and mistress Camilla cheating, it was true. It wasn't paranoia. Prince Charles later admitted infidelity. A decade after Princess Diana passed away, Prince Charles married Camilla, who became the Duchess of Cornwall.

Princess Diana

Rumors abound online regarding the car crash that killed Princess Diana. The car she was being driven in was going at a fast rate of speed to get away from paparazzi. However, one of the paparazzi, James Andanson, was known for arriving on the scene first when a celebrity dies.

Andanson clipped the car Princess Diana was being driven in, sending the vehicle into a concrete pillar in the tunnel. Then, Andanson fled the scene before police and paramedics arrived. He was later found on a military field, having allegedly set himself and his car on fire. He was pronounced dead.

Other alarming items include, Henri Paul, the chauffer of Princess Diana and her boyfriend Dodi Fayed, having received a very large wire transfer into his bank account shortly before getting behind the wheel drunk on the night of the car crash. Another report by former Metropolitan Police Chief John Stevens stated the chauffer Henri Paul was an intelligence officer.

One of the hardest claims about Princess Diana's death is she was killed after her boyfriend, Dodi, an Egyptian, proposed to her, because certain people did not want a black man being the father-in-law of the future king of England.

In the 2011 article "Princess Diana Film: The Royal Family Had Her Murdered For Dating & Becoming Pregnant By A Black Man" I wrote, "The film 'Unlawful Killing' has a photo of Princess Diana, as she sat mortally wounded in the back of the car. An eerie factor brought up in the film is a note on Princess Diana's letterhead, well before her death, proclaiming she feared she would be killed in a car crash, orchestrated by the royal family, because she "would not go quietly" after her divorce from Prince Charles and began dating a black man (Al Fayed)."

My tweet on Twitter about the subject

As seen in the film "Unlawful Killing" Princess Diana firmly believed she would be killed on the orders of the royal family and it would be done via a car crash to look like an accident. Then it happened...

STORY SOURCE

Spying on Princess Diana?

February 27, 2006, 12:24 PM - Feb. 27, 2006 — -- A British official conducting a coroner's inquiry into Princess Diana's death reportedly thinks American and French intelligence agencies may be able to shed new light on what happened that night in August 1997 as Diana and her boyfriend, Dodi Fayed, fled paparazzi.

The allegations read like something out of a James Bond novel -- that U.S. secret agents had bugged Diana's cellular phone and that her driver that night in Paris was a French spy. Lord Stevens, the British official investigating Diana's death, has reportedly subpoenaed more than 1,000 pages of transcripts from U.S. authorities, who were monitoring Diana's calls at the request of their British counterparts.

British detectives have already confirmed the princess was using her cell phone moments before the crash and have raised the possibility that her last conversation was included in the top secret file...

https://abcnews.go.com

Princess Diana Was 'Placed Under Surveillance,' But 1,000-Page Dossier Won't Be Released

10/01/18 AT 5:48 AM - Princess Diana was spied on when she was still alive. According to Nicholas Bieber, a journalist for Daily Star, the People's Princess was under surveillance by a secret intelligence agency which partnered with "Five Eyes," currently known as UKUSA, and "targeted" by the US's National Security Agency. They apparently built up a 1,056-page dossier on her. However, the documents won't be released as it was deemed "classified."

According to The Guardian, NSA later admitted that they had files on Princess Diana, but would never release it. "(They are) classified because their disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security," the report read.

NSA told The Observer that although they held intelligence on Princess Diana, they never actively monitored her movements. "The National Security Agency does not target British citizens, and any information that NSA holds that references Princess Diana is purely incidental to its collection," the spokesman said...

In related news, according to Princess Diana's former butler, Paul Burrell, she suspected Prince Charles of plotting an automobile accident to kill her and marry Camilla Parker Bowles. The late Princess of Wales told Burrell about it months before the fatal car crash.

"Her words were 'these next few months, are the most difficult months of my life. I fear my husband is going to kill me. In an automobile accident. With head injuries. In order that he can remarry.' That is spooky. She predicted her own death nine months before she died, That is spooky. She predicted her own death nine months before she died," Burrell said.

On the other hand, author Sarah Whalen claimed that Princess Diana was indeed murdered. However, according to her, it was part of the "ancient actual ritual." She insisted that Princess Diana followed the footsteps of many royal women including Henry VIII's wives Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard.

https://www.ibtimes.com

NSA Admits to Spying on Princess Diana

Saturday, December 12, 1998; Page A13 - The National Security Agency has disclosed that U.S. intelligence is holding 1,056 pages of classified information about the late Princess Diana, inspiring a flurry of sensational headlines this week across London's tabloids.

"America's spy chiefs admitted last night they snooped on Princess Diana for years -- and learned some of her most intimate love secrets," The Mirror reported on Thursday. The Daily Record claimed that the NSA intercepts "have gone on right until she died in the Paris car crash with Dodi Fayed."

The truth, while intriguing, is unlikely to be so lurid. The source of the Fleet Street speculation was a simple, two-page NSA denial of a Freedom of Information Act request. In the denial, released last month, the super-secret U.S. spy agency admitted possessing a Diana file.

The document says nothing about the contents of those 1,056 secret pages, why they were gathered or how they were obtained. One U.S. intelligence official said yesterday that the references to Diana in intercepted conversations were "incidental"...

The report focused on a system called Echelon through which the NSA and its spy partners in Britain, Canada, New Zealand and Australia share communications intercepted from around the world and systematically divide the huge task of analyzing the "take."

"Each of the five [countries] supply 'dictionaries' to the other four of keywords, phrases, people and places to 'tag,' and the tagged intercept is forwarded straight to the requesting country," according to the report.

"The end of the Cold War has not, apparently, brought an end to the [NSA's] Echelon eavesdropping system," a state-funded Russian daily, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta, complained last month. "This system has become a weapon of 'economic warfare.'"...

The Freedom of Information Act request seeking classified material on Diana was submitted earlier this year by an Internet news service based in New York, apbonline.com. In denying the request, the NSA disclosed existence of a 1,056-page Diana file and reported that Fort Meade, where the agency is located, had produced 39 "NSA-originated and NSA-controlled documents," totaling 124 pages.

Those documents, the NSA denial said, had been classified top secret "because their disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security"...

https://www.washingtonpost.com

Why Would U.S. Secret Service Bug Princess Di's Phone?

February 27, 2008, 10:56 PM - Dec. 11, 2006 — -- New questions are being raised about the death of Princess Diana, and the conspiracy theories are swirling again. A British investigation, due out Thursday, will say that the princess was being spied on by the U.S. Secret Service.

The report by former Metropolitan Police Chief John Stevens will say that U.S. Secret Service agents were bugging Diana's phone the night she died. The National Security Agency, though refusing to comment on the British report before its release, did release a statement denying any surveillance on the princess.

"NSA did not target Princess Diana's communications," the statement said. Exactly why any agency may have been following Diana remains a mystery. Indeed, there's a lot of mystery surrounding Diana's death. The 36-year-old princess; her friend, Dodi Fayed, 42; and driver Henri Paul died when their Mercedes crashed inside Paris' Pont d'Alma tunnel on Aug. 31, 1997.

A tragic accident or the culmination of a sinister plot? Conspiracy theories have swirled for nearly 10 years. Lord Stevens, once Britain's top cop, has spent three years searching for the truth. He is expected to reveal some tantalizing tidbits, including those bugging allegations.

But why would the United States bug Princess Diana? "She actually had put herself in a very high-profile political position. I think it probably would be odd if she wasn't being monitored," said Ingrid Seward, the editor in chief of Majesty Magazine.

For example, Diana was a vocal campaigner for a ban on land mines. "Perhaps it's that link that made her of interest to outside intelligence services," said Crispin Black, a former British government intelligence analyst. "That doesn't mean it was something sinister."

U.S. officials will not comment on the report's expected accusations. Stevens will also reportedly confirm that Diana's driver that night was an agent of French intelligence, the DST. "If I were an FBI man or a DST man or a MI5 man, I would make sure I had drivers in all the big hotels in the big cities working for me," Black said. Despite that, Stevens will reportedly conclude this was a tragic car accident, plain and simple.

Crucial to Stevens' conclusion that it was an accidental death is a fresh DNA test on Paul's blood that proves that he was drunk and that the blood tested was actually his. One rampant conspiracy theory suggests the DNA samples were switched. But will his word be enough? "Nobody wants to think that somebody so gorgeous, so troubled, so interesting could have died such an ordinary death," Seward said.