Professor Admits Climate Change Fraud

February 15. 2010

Professor Phil Jones

Professor Phil Jones, of the University of East Anglia, has admitted Climate Change is a fraud. His email account and those of his colleagues, were hacked and disclosed to the public a few months ago, revealing doctored scientific data on global warming, " Jones said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming."

Jones has refused to turn over research documents in response to a formal Freedom of Information Act request in Britain. In the Judiciary Report's experience, when people refuse to comply with the Freedom of Information Act, it is usually because they are guilty and don't want the evidence to come out. The cat's already out the bag, so you may as well just rip the band aid off and get it over with.

Side Bar: do you know how many people wanted a BMW or Mercedes, but didn't buy one, because they were told it is bad for the environment, so instead, they drove cars the size of matches boxes.

Climategate Fraud Admitted

Written by David Arnett, Publisher Monday, 15 February 2010 10:34 - The United Kingdom’s Daily Mail is reported Sunday that the scientist at the center of the controversy over fraudulent scientific assertions which serve as the basis for United Nation reports and the Obama Administration’s economy killing energy program has admitted that he has trouble “keeping track” of information and that his record keeping is “not as good as it should be.”

Professor Phil Jones, whose data is crucial to the theory of climate change, is refusing Freedom of Information requests to produce the data. Colleagues say the reason is that the Professor may have actually lost the relevant papers.

Sunday on the BBC Jones said there was truth to the observations of colleagues that he lacked organizational skills. He conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now and suggested global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon. Jones said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming...

The Obama Administration and Congressional Democrats continue to fight for an energy policy they call “Cap and Trade” (or Restrict and Tax by critics) which would cost anyone who owns a light switch or rents one in America. At a time of increasing concern over national financial stability, critics believe such a program would have devastatingly harmful effects both directly and in secondary costs to American consumers...

http://www.tulsatoday.com