Obama's Attempts To Reinstall FBI Director Deemed Unconstitutional

| |

Obama's Attempts To Reinstall FBI Director Deemed Unconstitutional

June 14. 2011

Barack Obama is running from the law on Mueller

According to constitutional scholars, U.S. President Barack Obama's attempt at extending the term of failure prone, FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller, is unconstitutional. As many writers have publicly expressed, for President Obama to dubiously assert he has been unable to find a suitable replacement for Mueller over the past 2 and a 1/2 years, is questionable and highly unlikely.

It is also an insult to America, as there are many qualified men and women in the nation, who could adequately fill the post and more importantly, bring some measure of justice, fairness, oversight and stability to the FBI, which it sorely lacks.

Robert S. Mueller

Mueller has the disgraceful distinction of being sued more times than any other FBI Director in U.S. history and it is due to his corrupt ways, racist beliefs, retaliatory conduct and acts of sheer treachery, when it comes to the rights and privacy of innocent people.

However, President Obama has a special arrangement with Mueller, who introduced him to a terrible breed of unconstitutional spying, as seen during the Bush Administration. Obama does not want to give up the unconstitutional and invasive investigative reports Mueller has been conducting against innocent people, as favors to the president, select politicians in Congress and wealthy individuals in the corporate sector and that is at the heart of the issue, in challenging established law regarding term limits, in such an extraordinary fashion.

RELATED ARTICLES

Bill O'Reilly Takes The FBI To Task Over Weiner

The FBI Busted Hiding Evidence

Why Did The FBI Let A Notorious Terrorist Go?

FBI Supervisors To FBI Director: We Want You Gone

STORY SOURCE

Might Giving Mueller Two More Years as FBI Head Be . . . Unconstitutional?

June 9, 2011, 1:28 PM ET - ...But while we’ve heard nary a peep from political partisans, we’re starting to hear wait-a-minutes from those who know more about the U.S. Constitution than yes, even your average senator or House member.

On Wednesday morning, as Politico reporter Josh Gerstein noted in this piece, UVA law professor John Harrison testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that the legislation endorsed by the White House to extend Mueller’s term might be constitutionally flawed. The reason: it would effectively allow Congress the power to install Mueller into the seat, a power reserved for the president by the constitution’s appointments clause.

“A statute like S. 1103 would, in a situation in which an office otherwise would be vacant, cause a particular individual through a legal act of Congress to hold that office . . . that is an appointment and that is something that Congress cannot do, that has to be done through the appointments clause.”...

http://blogs.wsj.com