This Judge Does Not Like Chris Brown

June 10. 2009  

Rihanna was at the Lakers basketball game, drinking beer and getting tipsy.

The female judge in the Chris Brown case, Patricia Schnegg, shut down another motion his lawyer, Mark Geragos, presented in court, which was a bid to delay the case and ultimately have it dismissed. The appeals court has now denied it as well. Previously, she denied his request for access to LAPD evidence, regarding a leaked Rihanna abuse photo.

The judge gave no explanation for her recent decision, which means she has none. Therefore, the scheduled June 22, 2009 court date, where Rihanna and her rooster hairdo are ordered to appear, still stands.

Side Bar: the judge should cite Rihanna for hair gel abuse.

Someone needs to tell Chris Brown to conduct himself with decorum, instead of running around getting tattoos, drinking, partying and kissing multiple women on Miami Beach, whilst a criminal court case rages on that could lock his black butt up.

The judge might be watching and it doesn't look good. Even I as a kind, loving, intelligent, impartial person that thinks both you and Rihanna suck and are criminals do not think it looks good that you are partying your brains out during such a case. 

Chris Brown loses bid to delay hearing

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Chris Brown lost a bid to delay a preliminary hearing in his assault case, which his attorney argued should wait for a related California Supreme Court decision.

Brown's attorney, Mark Geragos, filed an appeal earlier this month to try to delay the R&B singer's preliminary hearing, now scheduled for June 22.

Two justices from California's Second District Court of Appeal signed an order Wednesday rejecting the arguments. The order did not give a reason why.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Patricia Schnegg last month rejected a bid by Geragos to get access to police records that the attorney argued were crucial to the hearing. Geragos' appeal states that a state Supreme Court case currently under consideration could affect Brown's access to the records and he was seeking a delay on those grounds...

http://www.google.com