Gay Group Calls Christians Ret*rded Homophobes

| |

Gay Group Calls Christians Ret*rded Homophobes

May 14. 2009

In Blighty news, a gay organization funded by the government, the British Association for Adoption and Fostering, has labeled Christians "retar*ed homophobes" for vocally opposing gay adoptions, as it contradicts religious beliefs.

Using the same premise some gays are using to repress and suppress public opinion, in violation of U.N. laws, via labeling anything said about them hate speech, shouldn't calling Christians "ret*rded" homophobes be considered a violation of hate speech laws or do gays deem mentally challenged people inferior and without rights. Can you say hypocrisy.

Slurred by the adoption Nazis: Critics of gay parenting are branded 'retarded homophobes'

Last updated at 1:53 AM on 14th May 2009 - People who have concerns about the adoption of children by gay couples are 'retarded homophobes', the state-funded national adoption agency said yesterday.

Those who protest over controversial gay adoption laws are merely 'whinging', according to the British Association for Adoption and Fostering.

Its insulting description angered senior MPs and former Cabinet Ministers, Roman Catholic and Church of England leaders.

New gay adoption row: The British Association for Adoption and Fostering told would-be gay adopters to not worry about society because 'retarded homophobes just needed an excuse to whinge'

New row: The British Association for Adoption and Fostering told would-be gay adopters to not worry about society - 'any critics are retarded homophobes'

It also offended disability campaigners, who have been trying to discourage the use of the word 'retarded' for years. Whitehall has banned the word for civil servants.

Many of those who are worried about gay adoption say that approving same-sex relationships goes against their Christian faith.

Mike Judge, of the Christian Institute thinktank, said last night: 'Christians are tired of being marginalised.

'We don't expect everyone to agree with us but organisations such as the BAAF should try to avoid this kind of language.'...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk