FBI Loses $101.7 Million Dollar Appeal
September 1. 2009
FBI Director Robert S. Mueller
The FBI treacherously framed four innocent men for murder four
decades ago, in attempting to meet an arrest quota. Even after the
FBI obtained evidence illustrating the men were completely innocent,
they sat on it and let them rot in prison for 40-years. Two of the
four
men died in prison.
Recently, they sued the FBI and an appalled jury awarded them $101.7
million dollars in damages, for the FBI's treacherous misconduct.
The FBI appealed the decision and lost.
Since when does the FBI care about money. They squander taxpayer
money all the time, spending it like water.
Many millions in taxpayer cash given to the FBI to protect the
nation, was misappropriated in acts of blatant theft and kickback
schemes, regarding their failed computer system. Therefore, why are
they up in arms over the verdict or is it the FBI doesn't mind money
being blown, as long as they are the ones spending it.
The men deserve every penny. Actually, it is not enough, as the FBI
stole something from them and their families that can never be
replaced - decades of their lives spent in prison, filled with
emotional trauma.
I am of the belief the FBI employees responsible should serve
40-years in prison for conspiracy, fraud, wrongful imprisonment and misprision
of felony. The FBI is crooked and needs to be closed.
STORY SOURCE
FBI loses appeal of $101.7m verdict
Globe Staff / August 28, 2009 -
Circuit court cites ‘trauma’ to 4 sent to prison. A federal appeals
court upheld yesterday a landmark verdict for four men framed by the FBI in a
gangland slaying, although the appellate judges said the $101.7 million damage
judgment awarded by a lower court was “at the outer edge of the universe of
permissible awards.’’
The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit said
the 2007 damage judgment to the families of Peter J. Limone, Joseph Salvati,
Louis Greco, and Henry Tameleo, believed to be the largest of its kind
nationally, was considerably higher than any of the three appellate judges would
have ordered.
“But when we take into account the severe emotional
trauma inflicted upon the scapegoats,’’ the appeals court wrote of the wrongly
imprisoned men, “we cannot say with any firm conviction that those awards are
grossly disproportionate to the injuries sustained.’’...
http://www.boston.com