.

Da Vinci

While I do not agree with Lewis Perdue or Dan Brown's works questioning the life of Christ in what is highly speculative with no evidence to back it up,  the one time one of them did have evidence, but regarding copyright infringement, Perdue, was disregarded by a questionable judge in favor of a billionaire multi-national corporation and notorious writer, who have clearly broken the law.

Yes, copyright infringement is a crime under U.S. and United Nation's laws.  

Even though I do not agree with their works, the law is the law, and Perdue should have won the case, but due to a judge summarily throwing the case out before it could go to trial, he did not. This was an injustice.

Let's review the case, shall we. Not what Dan Brown tells you or the judge, who are corruptible, but what the evidence tells you, as many of you online are wondering out loud how Dan Brown got away with blatantly stealing from works a lot of you read before his subsequent infringing book The Da Vinci Code was ever written or published.

Once again, the law is the law and someone was clearly robbed - that being Purdue. He's sold 4 million books of his works. He authored  books that Dan Brown read (admitted it in trial) and clearly ripped off. The illustrations below will clearly show this, beyond a doubt.

How, due to blatant corruption within the U.S. judicial system, this like many entertainment industry cases (unless you are a famous person suing another famous person or company) was wrongfully and questionably closed by a corrupt judge siding with the rich and famous and corporate thieves, as opposed to the average citizen whose rights were clearly violated.

Purdue's evidence that Dan Brown, who really is a fraud (others have accused him of stealing from their books that he clearly slaps together to make one big infringing book) and once again I do not endorse or agree with the content in any way shape or form, but he clearly got riffed off and the court system inappropriately threw out his rights: 

Expert Analysis Of Plagiarism Evidence In The Da Vinci Code

One example of the many similarities: 

 Or this example which is identical in events, pacing, tone and sequence in both books:

1. A slain curator of art leaves a gold key,

2. concealed in a work of art,

3. painted on wood.

4. That work of art is named for the divine feminine at the center of the book.

5. The gold key is not a traditional key that opens a tumbler.

6. The key is left (with no instruction) for the book's heroine

7. who is, herself, a symbol of and related to the divine feminine.

8. The gold key allows access (but does not turn a lock) to a safe deposit box in a Zurich bank.

9. The safe deposit box holds yet another container which has a combination that must be set.

10. The contents of the container holds additional clues to finding the object of their search that send the hero and heroine to a foreign country.

11. The object of their search is a set of bones and documents relating to the divine feminine at the heart of the book.

 Or this comparison of the heroine:

 
# Random House filed suit to silence the facts I was posting on the web.
# There has been NO trial on the facts, only the Random House effort to prevent a trial.
# The only sworn statements made under penalty of perjury are affidavits from me and my experts, nothing from RH.
# The judge refused to consider any expert analysis.
# Despite suing me first, Random House & Sony are trying to make me pay the legal fees they spent to sue me.
# Contrary to the Random House spin, I am not alleging plagiarism of general issues, but of several hundred very specific ones.
# This is not about money. Anything I win goes to charity." - From Perdue's web site 

Any impartial, fair minded human being can see the blatant similarities and copyright infringement, yet a judge quickly tossed out the case before it could go to trial, a questionable pattern present in many, many entertainment industry cases in America, in favor of the rich and famous and multi-million dollar corporations.

It also happened in the Sophia Stewart case against Warner Bros and the Matrix Films that were stolen from her copyrights.

When you read the online content, you see how Warner Bros and co criminally violated her copyrights. It was also publicly reported that the FBI actually found evidence that her copyrighted script was on the set of the film the Matrix, used in making the film, but a corrupt judge said she didn't see the infringements and threw the case out, corruptly blocking it from getting to trial. Do contact your nearest optometrist or get off the bench.

Stewart's case has been widely talked about in Europe in a disdainful manner at the expense of the country's name, all because of one corrupt judge. Thousands of web sites reference the case.

There is clearly corruption among the judges, who are presiding over cases depriving Americans of their rights everyday they are in session. And the people who are said judges' oversight are also said judges fellow judicial buddies - big conflict of interest that is failing Americans everyday court is in session. 

When it gets to a point that communist China can cite corruption in the U.S. judicial system in a report against the U.S., it says these judges have gone too far.

I have a question, when is Congress going to clean up the judicial system? Something tells me these judges are going to create a colossal catastrophe for this country one day.

LEGAL FILE Davinci Crock Pt 3

Dan Brown author of "The Da Vinci Code"

So called author of "The Da Vinci Code" Dan Brown, is being sued again for plagiarism and copyright infringement. This case is concrete evidence the man is a thief:

1."Mr. Brown does not deny that he consulted the book 'The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail' before publishing "The Da Vinci Code."

2. Not only did he admit to using the already copyrighted book in question, which predates his by almost 20 years, in writing his own book "The Da Vinci Code," according to the New York Times he, "Used a partial anagram of the authors' surnames" whose book he willfully plagiarized, in his own book.

Reuters reported, "Commentators have pointed out that a major character in 41-year-old Brown's book, Sir Leigh Teabing, has a name that is an anagram of Leigh and Baigent." For the blondes on the site, you can make Baigent out of author  Teabing's surname.

That is a common habit of plagiarists. I have experienced this myself with the people who stole my copyrighted works. The names and or alterations thereof, of the writers they steal from appear in the infringing works. Classic sign of a full fledged plagiarist.

3. The book the "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" and the plagiarizing "The Da Vinci Code" are published by the same company, Random House (publishers of James Frey's "A Million Little Pieces"). However, as mentioned above, "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" was published 20 years before Dan Brown's infringing version.

4. It was reported in the New York Times that Dan Brown owns a copy of the book "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" and used it for research in writing his book.  

5. Dan Brown has been sued in another venue by another writer for Copyright Infringement.

Dan Brown entering British High Court [Reuters]

A few months ago, I wrote about the lawsuit brought against plagiarist Dan Brown in U.S. Federal Court by American Lewis Purdue for stealing items from his copyrighted books "The Da Vinci Legacy" and "Daughter of God" - and how I found the Judge’s ruling in favor of the plagiarist and not the plaintiff Perdue, quite dubious.

The judge in the case reasoned away all the infringements that everyone could see, in his attempt to protect the famous, albeit disgraced at this point, author.

It’s all starting to look like Brown slapped together his book "The Da Vinci Code" from other copyrighted works already in existence, which is illegal and unethical.

You are not in high school anymore. You cannot use other people’s works as research for your writings and not give them credit and compensation. Even in high school you have to cite it in a bibliography, thus giving the original source credit.

Dan Brown is starting to look like another James Frey.

If you so blatantly steal from so many to put your writings together, it is prima facie evidence that you need to quit your day job, as it is a farce and making you a fraud.

Dan Brown's Credibility

According to a Wikipedia contributor who cites sources, there are discrepancies in Dan Brown's personal bio i.e. it appears that he has lied about several things:

1. Brown states that during his Junior year at Amherst college, he went to Europe to study art history at the University of Seville in Spain, which is where he first began seriously studying the works of Leonardo da Vinci: http://www.bookreporter.com/authors/talk-brown-dan.asp

However, according to an article by Alvaro Sanchez Leon in the January/February 2006 issue of the Spanish-language magazine Epoca, "Ese señor nunca ha estado matriculado en esta universidad, a no ser que se apuntara a un curso de otoño de los que se dan en la "Facultad de Geografía e Historia" para alumnos extranjeros." (translation: He was never registered at this university, unless he attended one of the Fall courses for foreign students at the Faculty of Geography and History.") http://blogs.periodistadigital.com/periodismo.php/2006/02/10/ies_dan_brown_un_mentiroso_compulsivo

http://extra_imaginariums.blogtotal.es/post/161/2114

2. In interviews, Brown says that his wife is an "art historian" and "painter", though there is no record of her having worked professionally in this capacity, aside from her assistance with the book research. When they met, she was the Director of Artistic Development at the National Academy for Songwriters in Los Angeles.

Therefore, how is it you are disputing the integrity of Christ, the only perfect Person who ever walked this Earth, insisting He had an illegitimate child and married Mary Magdalene, stating this with absolutely no proof whatsoever might I add, based on clues in paintings National Geographic have proved to be historically and architecturally inaccurate, when you have proved yourself to be a thieving, dishonest, bio forging, untrustworthy fraud.

© Copyright 2007 - 2014 Aisha. All Rights Reserved. Web site design by Aisha for Sonustar Interactive

Aisha | Aisha Blog | Aisha Blog Archive | Goodison Trust | Sonustar | Sonustar News | Judiciary Report | Sound Off Column | Celluloid Film Review | Consumer News Reviews | Compendius | United Peace Initiative | Justice And Truth