Congress Slaps Down Robert Mueller Investigation Via The U.S. House Intelligence Committee Ending Investigation And Pronouncing They Found No Collusion Between President Trump And Russia

March 14. 2018

Robert S. Mueller

The U.S. House Intelligence Committee has just let the air out of the criminal investigation by Special Counsel, Robert S. Mueller, into alleged collusion between the Russian government and President Donald Trump. Congressman K. Michael Conway of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee stated, “The bottom line: The Russians did commit active measures against our election in ‘16, and we think they will do that in the future. We disagree with the narrative that they were trying to help Trump.”

Conway further stated regarding the 150 page report on Trump and Russia, “We found no evidence of collusion. We found perhaps some bad judgment, inappropriate meetings, but only Tom Clancy or Vince Flynn or someone else like that could take this series of inadvertent contacts with each other, or meetings, whatever, and weave that into some sort of fictional page-turner spy thriller.” In response to the news, President Trump stated he is “very happy.”

Mueller’s former subordinate and successor at the FBI, James Comey, who was fired months ago by Trump, did previously state in Congress that the investigation was not centered on the President. However, some people either were not aware of his statement made during the televised congressional hearing or disregarded it.

Mueller’s investigation will continue. Muller, whom I've broken exclusive stories on that proved true, is in the investigation for the wrong reason, as it's his bid to control the president, who has resisted the status quo and is doing what he wants to do. Trump has shaken up Washington and they don't like it.

As Mueller's investigation was initiated by a $9,000,000 dossier paid for by Trump’s now failed political rival for the presidency, Hillary Clinton, who illegally used campaign funds to do so, not to mention the contents are unverified with no proof or evidence of any kind, there exists a conflict of interest that is wasting taxpayer money at the Department of Justice, via Mueller, to the tune of millions of dollars.

A government investigation should not have been triggered on the actions of a person, Clinton, who wanted the presidency so badly she paid millions for an unproven dossier to be compiled by a former spy, who cannot back up what is in the document, not even with a shred of evidence.

For $9,000,000 many people would write whatever you tell them to on paper. I am of the belief Clinton wrote some of the dossier herself, as she was writing glowing endorsement articles for newspapers during the presidential campaign, kissing her own butt, but they ran under journalists names, as was exposed last year in the mainstream press.

Clinton desperately wanted to win the election. She sought to discredit Trump by claiming he is a Russian spy, in conduct that has completely divided the country and caused very caustic fights on television and the internet. No proof has been presented that Trump is a Russian spy or colluded with their government.

I will state this. I do not agree with the committee members' statements that Russia was not trying to discredit Clinton to help Trump. The Russian government has a grievance against Clinton from her days as U.S. Secretary of State when she sold Russia 20% of America’s Uranium, then made unflattering statements about what her foreign policy would be regarding them.

I am of the belief the Russian government saw Trump as a fresh start, who would potentially engage in talks with them as president, to lift sanctions Democrats enacted (oil). Trump did indicate he would be open to talks with various nations if he became president and showed Russia no ill will.

I am of the belief, the Russian government saw him as a better choice for president for that reason and worked to make Clinton look as undesirable as possible via the internet. However, where the law is concerned, floating unflattering items online about Clinton (or anyone else) is not illegal (as long as it is not a death threat).

No evidence has been presented that the Russian government hacked and changed the vote for Trump (in fact, the voting discrepancies that occurred in states like Michigan were in Clinton's favor). The Russian government slammed Clinton online, which is covered by free speech.

Some Democrats in Congress are in denial about the fact many people do not like Hillary Clinton. Otherwise Trump would not have gotten so many votes. There are everyday Americans who publicly expressed disdain for Clinton, due to her extremely liberal views, the Whitewater criminal investigation, the appalling treatment of her husband’s rape and sexual assault accusers whom she sent abusive, lawbreaking private investigators after such as Anthony Pellicano, as well as the Clinton foundation’s terrible acts of corruption in the Caribbean nation of Haiti, Africa and South America. Hillary is not Mary Poppins. Stop acting like she's Mother Teresa.

I did not vote for either candidate, but I can tell you right now, Clinton would never have gotten my vote after the corruption that poured out of that woman, regarding her former private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, whom the FBI interviewed me about twice, then 4-months later arrested for the very things I stated he did to many innocent people.

I've broke stories on Clinton (Hillary Clinton Wanted To Murder Wikileaks' Julian Assange Via A Drone). I wrote a string of highly critical articles about Clinton during the election for the simply fact I think she is very corrupt and presents a danger to the Caribbean (more later on a tip I received regarding lives being at stake in the region due to Clinton and company) and Christian rights.

After the manner in which Clinton’s former boss, U.S. President, Barack Obama, abusively used the IRS to target and discriminate against conservative Christians like me, in a story I broke first, that was later confirmed by the mainstream press a year after and made its way into Congress in highly charged hearings, I was not going to support anything that was in that administration (More Information On The Obama Administration Using The IRS To Harass And Intimidate Politically Outspoken People and IRS Says Sorry For Targeting Conservatives).

There are many Christians like me who did not like the appalling financial, privacy and human rights abuses of the Obama administration and it cost Clinton votes, because we naturally believed, as she worked for him and agreed with his views, she would be an extension of those abuses if she was elected president.

I also disliked things Hollywood had been saying regarding Clinton and alleged plans of her administration if she became president and she is in league with them. After taking all that into consideration, I denounced Clinton on this site read by millions and on social networking, stating she should not be president (especially over the aforementioned item regarding Clinton and the Caribbean, which I will explain in great detail in a future article).

Clinton also lost votes as a former Obama cabinet member, due to the radical attacks the former president made on white people while in office. If you read social networking, many went with Trump because he is the polar opposite of Obama. As a black woman, had I been in office anywhere, I would treat every race equally, as I believe God made us all equal. I don’t know why Obama went into office and with his administration, showed such hostility towards white people, especially in his second term.

Obama has made it harder for every black person in America who would want to be president in the future, because white people are going to be concerned they will get a repeat of the radicalism and militancy he exhibited during his second term. Obama's presidency left white people feeling disenfranchised and hated in America.

This is what all this open hostility and racial division is about and it gave Trump the vote. Trump tapped into that and it got him to the White House. This is why so many white Democrats, including some who had voted for Obama, switched to Trump during the election. Obama's second term militancy alarmed them. And so, the pendulum swung all the way to the political right, the far right, as far as it would go.

I know America has a bitter history of slavery that was terrible. I know the wounds still exist. I know that some, NOT ALL, people are still racist towards minorities. However, the goal of any head of state, anywhere in the world, should be reconciliation between the races. The order of the day should be cohesion, harmony, equality and the prosperity of the nations.

Lastly, people need to keep the peace. Things have become so toxic. Racial hatred and violence will only divide and damage America. Civility, peace and brotherhood/sisterhood should be the order of the day. If you can’t find common ground, peacefully agree to disagree. That is the only way to productively move forward.

STORY SOURCE

Despite Mueller’s Push, House Republicans Declare No Evidence of Collusion

MARCH 12, 2018 - Even as the special counsel expands his inquiry and pursues criminal charges against at least four Trump associates, House Intelligence Committee Republicans said on Monday that their investigation had found no evidence of collusion between Donald J. Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia to sway the 2016 election.

Representative K. Michael Conaway, the Texas Republican who is leading the investigation, said committee Republicans agreed with the conclusions of American intelligence agencies that Russia had interfered with the election, but they broke with the agencies on one crucial point: that the Russians had favored Mr. Trump’s candidacy.

“The bottom line: The Russians did commit active measures against our election in ’16, and we think they will do that in the future,” Mr. Conaway said. But, he added, “We disagree with the narrative that they were trying to help Trump.”...

https://www.nytimes.com