This case is just reprehensible. It constitutes many violations of the Constitution and U.S. Code, which is thoroughly being abused in this instance. If said case is not properly resolved, meaning letting the woman go, cleaning up her record that was besmirched and apologizing, it will permanently erode the people of Ohio's faith in the judiciary:

Dr. Elsebeth Baumgartner (born May 12, 1955) is a former attorney and current CEO of Cleveland Genomics, Inc. (which provides DNA sequencing services), and has doctorate degrees both in law and in pharmacy. Dr. Baumgartner graduated first in her entering class from the University of Toledo College of Law.

She is a Christian and the mother of two adult daughters by her husband, pharmacist Joseph Baumgartner. She is currently facing criminal charges in the U.S. state of Ohio carrying prison sentences of 66 years and 6 months in one case, and 42 years and 6 months in another case, for peaceful political speech. Currently she is free on bail.

The specific criminal charges against Dr. Baumgartner are intimidation, retaliation, falsification and possession of a criminal tool (the criminal tool being a laptop computer) for her criticizing Ohio government officials and accusing them of corruption, such as against retired Judge Richard Markus. Note that Dr. Baumgartner isn't being accused of making threats to aggress against anyone, but that the intimidation and retaliation charges directly refer to her accusations of corruption on the part of Ohio government officials.

Dr. Baumgartner previously had served 231 days in jail on the charge of falsification for accusing Ohio government officials of corruption at a Port Clinton City Commissioner's meeting (i.e., a city council meeting). Ten of those days were spent being held incommunicado, having been denied access to legal counsel, visitors, clergy, the opportunity to make a phone call, and not allowed to send mail out or receive mail.

In 2003, Dr. Baumgartner was permanently disbarred as an attorney for accusing Ohio government officials of corruption in a hearing where she was not allowed to be present and where the sole evidence against her was those who had been accused of corruption denying the charges. In December 2005, Dr. Baumgartner was committed against her will for 39 days to the North Coast Hospital under court order for a mental evaluation, even though Ohio state law requires that a person released on bond, as Dr. Baumgartner is, be evaluated on an out-patient basis. She was found competent. Two times previously she had been psychologically evaluated, and each time found competent.

A number of critics of the actions taken against Dr. Baumgartner by the Ohio judiciary contend that she is being made a political prisoner in order to silence her and punish her for speaking out on government corruption by the very parties accused of corruption as a means to protect themselves from the legitimate consequences of their crimes and to make an example out of her by creating a chilling effect to intimidate others from speaking out against their corruption.

These critics note that she has already been jailed for peaceful political speech and that the Ohio government is currently attempting to imprison her for a total of 109 years for peaceful political speech. Such critics further contend that even if all of her accusations were false that a person ought not be made a criminal or suffer imprisonment for mere peaceful speech (i.e., not threatening to aggress against another), even if said speech is false, and that the ultimate reason for the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is precisely so that people can be free to criticize the government and officials in government, and say things which said officials greatly dislike, without fear of retaliation by the government." - Answers.com, Wikipedia

Judge Richard Markus should be ashamed of himself. He is abusing his position and should face the legal and social consequences that are supposed to accompany such conduct.

The telling part: "Note that Dr. Baumgartner isn't being accused of making threats to aggress against anyone, but that the intimidation and retaliation charges directly refer to her accusations of corruption on the part of Ohio government officials."

Read that and wake up people. She's not committed a crime. She's not being accused of any crime that is on the law books, in the U.S. Code or in the U.S. Constitution.

This woman was arrested for exercising her right to free speech in calling elected officials corrupt and she cited proof. Regarding what they're doing to her, I'd say they've proved her allegations right, as it all looks very corrupt to the public (Google yourselves and the case).

Judge Richard Markus went to one of his judge buddies and through a secret indictment got the woman arrested for exercising her constitutional rights to free speech where she did not threaten him. She is being stitched up. If it happened to her, it can happen to you.

Sounds like something out of a courtroom in Iraq before Saddam got ousted. People on the net are referring to the treatment she is receiving as "Nazi."

Germany has progressively and commendably stepped away from that time in history, experiencing great growth - why are those judges in that case trying to bring back that time in history?